bookbear express
- Read original article here
All meritocratic platforms are winner-take-all, with the top 1% of performers collecting a vastly disproportionate share of rewards. Look at Substack and Onlyfans. This is not a conspiracy engineered by anyone: when anyone is allowed to compete, a small percentage of people tend to capture most of the profit. The platforms themselves aren’t incentivized to provide statistics, but everything I’ve seen suggests the median person on Etsy or Patreon makes a negligible amount of money (probably around $100/month). The media paints a narrative of villainous tech CEOs masterminding the takeover of the world. The reality is that most of these founders are just really good engineers who stumbled upon a idea. Consumer desire for the idea blew it up. Then they tried to stay competitive in the market. Onlyfans ranking % and how much actual money that corresponds to:
American society is driven by hyperindividualism: we are all free and independent individuals who can choose to do pretty much what we want. This clearly isn’t true, since people obviously aren’t free: they’re controlled by socioeconomic circumstances. I think most people feel like it’s impossible for them succeed in today’s world (“I will never be able to buy a house”), which leads to widespread depression, lack of interest in having children, and turning to things like meme stocks and crypto speculation as a “cope” to try to keep the American dream alive.
This is evident even in the crisis feminism is going through today: the failure of neoliberalism “girlbosses” is really about the way that the economy fails almost everybody today, the way that labor has become hyperspecialized and therefore alienated from meaning. I think that’s also why people resent tech so much: because so much money flows through tech, and people outside the industry perceive the people inside it as undeserving.
People have become anti-work because work used to be a source of meaning and prosperity, and now it isn’t. But meaningful work is the one of the only sources of meaning along with family and religion. If we lose it, we only have nihilism. Freddie deBoer onwhy the left is a labor movement. From David Graeber’sBullshit Jobs: “Perhaps the reason the liberal middle-class is so pessimistic is because a lot of them suspect that what they do adds little or no value to the economy around them, and that because of AI or another recession, there will be some kind of reckoning when we realise that our economy has turned millions of workers into superfluous people.”
People are conflicted about capitalism. You have to make money, compete, provide for your family, etc. But if you’retoo good at capitalismyou’re a monster. We pressure people to be competitive and we resent the people who compete successfully. We say,young people are so spoiled, if you want a good standard of living why don’t you just move to the middle of Minnesota and go to trade school and you can make 90k per year. But our society has conditioned us to believe that consumption and status are the only things that provide happiness: the smartest children of our generation are going to Stanford and MIT to join Goldman Sachs, McKinsey and FAANG. Fisher on how Zizek believes that we use an ironic distance from capitalism to allow us to keepengaging in it: “Cynical distance is just one way ... to blind ourselves to the structural power of ideological fantasy: even if we do not take things seriously, even if we keep an ironical distance,we are still doing them.”
We yearn for radicalism, for inventism. This is why the right is doing better politically than left, because they have the language of nationalism. The left is offering nothing except management and consolation. The left has failed by refusing to produce imaginative politicians who can tell a compelling story of who we are and where we’re going.
Terrence McKenna: “I think the real test of psychedelics is what you do with them when you're not on them, what kind of culture you build, what kind of art, what kind of technologies... What's lacking in the Western mind is the sense of connectivity and relatedness to the rest of life, the atmosphere, the ecosystem, the past, our children's future. If we were feeling those things we would not be practicing culture as we are.” Curtis: “If you live in a world driven by individualism, what it doesn’t answer is what goes on when you die. I made a film about that arch-individualist Ayn Rand. She was interviewed towards the end of her life by an American television journalist who asked her what she thought would happen when she died and she said: “I won’t die. The world will die”. It sounds silly, but what she actually means is true if you are an arch-individualist. If you are complete within yourself and don’t owe anything to anything else, then the whole world is in your head, and when you die it will go. I often think that one of the reasons why there is so much pessimism around, especially among the baby-boomer generation, is that they cannot face the terrible fact of their own mortality. So what they have to do is project that onto the whole planet.”
25% people take psychiatric drugs in the US because they are suffering from the decline in quality of life for the average person. They’re told to vote and “participate in democracy,” but they sense on some level that all politicians do is manage and placate as life gets worse. Personal enlightenment is a way to make a broken world bearable. Mark Fisher: “In the 1960s and 1970s, radical theory and politics (Laing, Foucault, Deleuze and Guattari, etc.) coalesced around extreme mental conditions such as schizophrenia, arguing, for instance, that madness was not a natural, but a political, category. But what is needed now is a politicization of much more common disorders. Indeed, it is their very commonness which is the issue: in Britain, depression is now the condition that is most treated by the NHS.”
The world is controlled by people with the skillset to succeed under capitalism, so it’s hard for them to understand other people’s despair because the system has been perfectly fine for them. Most people who say they dream of socialism are humanities-oriented and aren’t economists and technologists. Politicians either advocate for actions that obviously ignore market forces (“All you have to do shop small and don’t buy from Amazon”) or reference the “pulling-yourself-by-your-bootstraps” rhetoric that no longer applies to the economy that we live in today. If you possess an unusual degree of personal charisma, sexual capital, an aptitude towards STEM, you’re probably pretty happy with how the world works. Otherwise, you can’t compete.
We are nihilistic because we feel, as Fisher puts it, “reflexively impotent.” David Graeber: “The ultimate hidden truth of the world is that it is something that we make and could just as easily make differently.” Fisher: “[Capitalist realism] is the widespread sense that not only is capitalism the only viable political and economic system, but also that it is now impossible even toimaginea coherent alternative to it.” Hence: acceleration, hedonism, destruction, freedom. But accelerationism feels like the acceptance that no one is at the wheel (God is dead. Long live technocapital). How can the world get better if no one is steering?
